TWILIGHT vs. HARRY POTTER

I met Robert Pattinson this May in Cannes. It was a top-secret kind of thing — I had to sign a paper saying I wouldn’t write a story about it until his new movie, The Twilight Saga: New Moon, opens in November — but I can reveal that the interview, which was held in the martini bar behind a beachside restaurant, was held to the background noise of a crowd of young girls who stood on the road, behind security barriers, and screamed non-stop. I don’t know how Pattinson finally got out: by sea would seem to be the only escape route. Otherwise, he may be there yet.

By contrast, Daniel Radcliffe, the star of the Harry Potter films that are competing for the same tween audience, is a less likely sex symbol: he’s short and nerdy. That’s not my judgment, it’s what Radcliffe himself said the other day. “If girls like short and nerdy, then I’m a sex symbol,” he said, adding, “Rob Pattinson is a sex symbol. He’s a genuinely sexy guy — he’s got the height.”

Pattinson, who coincidentally played Cedric Diggory in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, is six foot one. Radcliffe is five foot six.

Radcliffe can also get young girls to scream, but his is a more restrained hysteria. At the New York City premiere of his new movie, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, he walked past the adult reporters to talk to an 11-year-old girl named Danielle, who was reporting for Scholastic News, an online service for kids. Here is part of that interview, as reported in New York magazine:

Danielle: “I’ve seen the first and second movies and read the first and second book and they are so good. Especially the movies. I loved them, the movies.”

Radcliffe: “Thank you very much. You’re very, very kind. They get even better than that though, so when you get the time, or when your parents think you’re old enough, you must watch the rest. They’re very cool.”

Radcliffe’s sweet and patient answer is a telling indication of the audience for the Harry Potter films as compared with the more mature passions of the Twilight fans who find Pattinson’s Edward Cullen character too adorable for words.

However, young wizards-in-waiting do grow up to become young virgins-in-waiting, and Harry Potter himself is growing into that more adult world: the word is that the new movie is more mature and that romance is in the air. The wizard is getting older, and suddenly it’s not all quidditch and magic spells.

That crossover in audience appeal has put Harry Potter into a kind of competition with Twilight. The vampire movie has made $382 million US, and while that is dwarfed by the Harry Potter success story — 400 million books sold, $4.5 billion at the box office — a rivalry has sprung up among fans, at least on a tsunami of fansites arguing the merits of the two franchises. (Sample debate, from nerdfighters.ning.com: If the Twilight characters and the Harry Potter characters got into a fight, who would win?)

The studios behind the series are steering clear of talk about competition, except for the fact that the Twilight films don’t open near the dates when Harry Potter movies are introduced.

Rob Friedman, head of Summit Entertainment, which produces the Twilight movies, told the Wall Street Journal, “We are very cognizant of where they are, and we’ve always been wary of being in too close proximity to Harry Potter because we know our fans cross over so much and we definitely don’t want to compete with Harry for attention.”

If Harry is still the king, Twilight is the coming thing. But not all Harry Potter fans have matured into Twilight aficionados and there are new readers all the time. An indication of Harry’s enduring popularity can be seen in an ad from Bauman Rare Books, a New York company: a 1940 first edition of Ernest Hemingway’s For Whom The Bell Tolls sells for $2,600; a signed first edition of John Le Carre’s 1963 novel The Spy Who Came In From The Cold is priced at $5,500, but an autographed first edition of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, which was published in 1998, costs $13,500.

Harry has burrowed into the common culture in a way that Twilight has yet to accomplish. A group called The Harry Potter Alliance, which promotes social activism among Harry Potter fans, is asking moviegoers who attend the new film to wear name tags stating lessons taught by Albus Dumbledore, Harry’s mentor, and to tweet these messages to each other (a discussion of the character’s lessons can be found at whatwoulddumbledoredo.org).

In a press release, Andrew Slack, the head of the alliance, compares Dumbledore’s messages to those of Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama.

So far, no one has said that about Edward Cullen. He is a vampire, but Harry Potter may be the one who lives forever.

July 13, 2009

4 Responses to “TWILIGHT vs. HARRY POTTER”

1

All I can say to this is there is no comparison. Don’t get me wrong I’ve read the Twilight series, I like them, but they can’t compare to HP. The Potter series is a well written series, a world unto its own. There a characters in the Potter series that I dislike because of who they are, but they are well written and I enjoy reading them. There are characters in Twilight like Jacob that are just Annoying and I find myself skipping through any part where he is the main focus. He annoys me that much. I enjoy Edward and Bella but I love Harry and his friends. The Potter books just has so much depth and meaning to them. Which is why they have transcended into our culture and I am positive remain there. Harry will indeed live forever. I don’t think the same can be said for Twilight.

2

I think this is the best Harry Potter movie yet, much darker than the previous ones

3

Harry Potter, a name we have all known throughout our childhood (or for a long time). Doesn’t matter if you read the books or not you still knew the name. HP didn’t become famous because of a movie, but because of the amazing story and world J.K. Rowling created for the earth to ponder. Even now the books have ended the world still cries out for more in the Harry Potter series. Is it even a question Harry Potter vs. Twilight? Twilight is just a faze or a trend and will die out immediately after the movies are done… Harry Potter (the books) has lived since 1997 in over 64 countries. A question to be a wizard or a vampire? Who would want to live forever?! Because the wisest character in the history of books once exclaimed… “To the well organized mind, DEATH is but the great adventure.” That quote just soars over any in Twilight… so get off your high horse and come to realization that Harry Potter, the boy who lived, will live forever to the World we live in.

4

When a person decides to read Twilight, I really hope they enjoy it. Also, I hope the same thing for someone who reads Harry Potter, but I expect more, too. The lessons and experiences that can be found through the Harry Potter series are rich and fulfilling, and much more so than any I found in Twilight. In my opinion, Twilight is something you can fixate upon (I surely did), but the Potter books satisfy my need for something more meaningful. There is a love in Harry that, like Mr Stone said, “has burrowed into the common culture,” and the HPA is at the forefront of keeping the ideas and lessons of the books alive and applicable to a general audience.

Leave a Reply