Gearing up against Global Warming

I just read an article in the NY Times that made me feel the following:

The United States of America is finally having an important debate where:

1- the strained debate on global warming, 2- the too often ignored debate on civilian protection, genocide, and poverty, AND 3- the often sensationalist debate around national security threats for the United States are suddenly interconnected:

The US military is finally looking at global warming as a very real national security threat. I believe that global warming is probably the most severe threat to US national security that we have seen since WWII. Droughts and starvation to millions if not billions of people are going to become refugees, running away from homes and into areas that do not have space for them nor an understanding of their culture. We’ve seen this happen before: war breaks out and dictators rise who orchestrate genocide either against the refugees or against those people already living there. The difference between that horrific and tragic situation compared to one caused by global warming, is that with global warming it will happen by the hundreds of millions and it would happen across the entire globe. Do you want to talk about an economic crisis? THAT would be an economic crisis!

The military is looking at how world trade could effectively shut down and from this chaos and desperation on a global scale, new breeds of terrorist organizations would try to recruit new terrorists to go out and wreak more havoc against Western countries. Situations like Hurricane Katrina would become matter-of-fact examples. The genocide in Sudan would become one of many genocides. The US military in trying to preserve some world order as well as fight terrorist threats and preserve international trade would be overextended in ways beyond belief.

For years and years the leading proponents against global warming have been around preserving the environment. Now that global warming is happening far faster than scientists predicted, the US military is stepping in and saying, “okay. This is a potentially HUGE problem for national security.” It’s like the Ministry just acknowledged that Voldemort has returned.

The NY Times quotes Senator John Kerry around connecting global warming to national security:

““I’ve been making this argument for a number of years,’ Mr. Kerry said, ‘but it has not been a focus because a lot of people had not connected the dots.’ He said he had urged President Obama to make the case, too.
“Mr. Kerry said the continuing conflict in southern Sudan, which has killed and displaced tens of thousands of people, is a result of drought and expansion of deserts in the north. ‘That is going to be repeated many times over and on a much larger scale,’ he said.’”

It’s time for us to understand that as much as we want polar bears to thrive on this planet, stopping global warming is not only about protecting one species or multiple species. It’s about protecting all life on this planet, including human life. While the extreme right wing under the funding of the insurance companies is wasting our time trying to thwart an honest debate on the best way to get Americans access to our doctors and replacing that with fist fights at town hall meetings and comparing those who want five year old children to have access to doctors to somehow be Nazis – much the same way that the Ministry was distracted looking for Sirius Black- Voldemort is back in the form of Global Warming. And the US military and US Senate are beginning to wake up.

There is still hope. We can still prevent the majority of these horrors from occurring. We just need to get beyond angry and weak presumptions that global warming is not real, that global warming is not a threat, that the disappearance of a Ministry employee, Harry’s name being put in the Goblet of Fire, and…oh wait, I mean that Katrina, drought in the sub-Sarahan desert, the melting of the polar ice caps and the drowning of polar bears are NOT isolated incidents. They are happening. They are all connected to what developed nations have done to the environment in the last two hundred years.

But we now have an opportunity. We have the opportunity to, for the first time since the Industrial Revolution work WITH the environment not against her. The time has come. We have very little time left in which we can still act to prevent these horrors. We need to act now.

This entry was posted in Harry Potter Alliance News. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. August 9, 2009 at 1:57 pm
    Permalink

    There is NO manmade global warming!! Wake up!! It has to do with 11 and 22 year solar cycles. The Vikings farmed Greenland for several hundred years approx 800-1200 A.D. and there were no SUVs or coal fire generating stations around.

  2. Patriot Awesomeness times a thousand

    August 9, 2009 at 3:38 pm
    Permalink

    Hey Patriot Dynamite: I would agree with you. There is no “man made global warming.” Too often we men are completely blamed for the problems caused on this planet. So thank you for the correction. Yes, yes, sorry to say it ladies but global warming is caused by both men AND women. Thanks again for the correction Patriot Dynamite.

    Oh, wait. Right. You actually believe that human beings have nothing to do with Global Warming. What you might not realize is that Vikings were TOTALLY into SUV’s and loved generating coal. lol

    Okay, fine. Kidding aside. You make a good point: there are solar cycles on this planet. But the science shows us that what we’re seeing with global warming is not related to Vikings farming Greenland or any traditional cycles that we know of. I can cite you the scientific journals if you like.

  3. Earl_E

    August 10, 2009 at 11:37 am
    Permalink

    Two comments, both denialists. But they seem to have lost their fire, no name calling, just lots of dialog with exclamation points with very base sarcasm.

    But they seem to entertain each other.

    11 and 22 year cycles hardly explains ice ages, now does it?

  4. Max

    August 20, 2009 at 5:58 pm
    Permalink

    One article I read recently, which at first seemed conservative and negatively provocative, actually turned out to be a very interesting read. It is from Esquire magazine, and the basic argument is that we should attack global warming indirectly– that by taking care of our people, we will take care of our planet.

    http://www.esquire.com/features/new-solutions-to-global-warming-0809

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>